Hypermoralism – Morality causes ordinary people to do immoral things.
Some people believe that immoral acts are caused by amoral individuals. However, very few people are truly immoral (~1% of individuals are psychopaths). The idea of the term, hypermoralism, is to popularize the idea that morality can actually cause people to be immoral, rather than prevent them from being immoral (e.g. see this post). It's very close to the idea of idealistic evil, except that I think the use of 'evil' makes it harder for people to see it in themselves. It's easier to accept that one might engage in hypermoralism from time to time rather than idealistic evil. But it's basically the same concept, couched in non-judgmental terms.
I hope to explore the idea of hypermoralism in a series of blog posts.
Posts in this category:
- Hypermoral Debt Ceiling Quotes
- Hypermoral Debt Ceiling Quotes
- Libya as a moral war (except for libertarians)
- Osama Bin Laden’s Death is a chance to escape Zero-Sum thinking
- Osama Bin Laden’s Death is a chance to escape Zero-Sum thinking
- You can’t put out a Fire with Gasoline – A Reaction to reactions to the Giffords Shooting
- Stewart/Colbert’s Rally to Restore Sanity and the Psychology of Moderates
- On Hyperpartisanship, Hypermoralism, and the Supernormal Stimuli of Modern Politics
- On Hyperpartisanship, Hypermoralism, and the Supernormal Stimuli of Modern Politics
- Sam Harris’ TED video and the danger of liberal atheist moral absolutism
- The Psychology of Aggression and the Ugliness of the Health Care Reform Debate
- Religion does not cause racism, but group morality may underlie both.
- Hypermoralism – Morality causes ordinary people to do immoral things.
- Hypermoralism – Morality causes ordinary people to do immoral things.
- Methland by Nick Reding: Moral Maximizing and the Drug War
Comments
Main Themes of This Blog
- •Post-Materialism: People are increasingly motivated by values and higher order psychological needs.
- •Book Reviews – Consilience between psychology and books I read.
- •Hypermoralism – Morality causes ordinary people to do immoral things.
- •What are the psychological differences that make people liberal democrats, conservative republicans, or libertarians?
Vote for the Best Psych Books
Categories
- book reviews
- business of psychology
- civil politics
- consilience
- consumer psychology
- data science
- differences between republicans and democrats
- drug laws
- gross domestic product
- hypermoralism
- justice and fairness
- libertarians
- Links
- main themes of this blog
- misc
- moral confabulation
- moral confabulation in the news
- moral emotions
- moral foundations
- moral imagination
- moral psychology
- news commentary
- political psychology
- positive psychology
- Post Materialism
- ranker
- replications of other studies
- technology business
- the old polipsych
- unpublished results
- War and Peace
- yourmorals.org
Blogroll
- AboutMyJob.com
- Consumer Psychology Self-Tests @ Beyond The Purchase.Org
- Pilates Anytime – Online Pilates Classes
- Ranker Votable Lists
- Ranker's Data Blog
- Tal Yarkoni's Psychology/Informatics Blog
- Tara Met Blog
- The Music is Over – Musician Obituaries
- YourMorals.org
Explore
academia
aggression
big 5
big data
civility
coherence
conservatives
consilience
differences between liberals and conservatives
disgust
empathy
equality
equity
fairness
hypermoralism
idealistic evil
incivility
jon stewart
liberals
liberals and conservatives
libertarians
libya
mitt romney
moral absolutism
moral foundations
moral maximizing
moral psychology
neuroticism
new york times
obama
openness to experience
partisanship
peace
peer review
personality traits
political psychology
religion
romney
social dominance orientation
social psychology
stephen colbert
sxsw
technology
votehelp.org
war book reviews (10)
business of psychology (17)
civil politics (16)
consilience (18)
consumer psychology (7)
data science (3)
differences between republicans and democrats (20)
drug laws (3)
gross domestic product (1)
hypermoralism (11)
justice and fairness (6)
libertarians (9)
Links (1)
main themes of this blog (4)
misc (1)
moral confabulation (10)
moral confabulation in the news (8)
moral emotions (3)
moral foundations (4)
moral imagination (2)
moral psychology (28)
news commentary (47)
political psychology (70)
positive psychology (13)
Post Materialism (7)
ranker (5)
replications of other studies (8)
technology business (1)
the old polipsych (4)
unpublished results (26)
War and Peace (7)
yourmorals.org (84)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Archive
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- April 2009
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2006
- May 2004
- April 2004
Consumer Psychology Posts
- If You?re Happy and You Know It, Check Your Text
- The Costs and Benefits of ?Living for Now?
- You are Not That Great
- Money and Happiness: The Costs and Benefits of Living for Now
- The First International Day of Happiness
Last 10 Posts:
- May 7, 2013
Personality Types in Business: Conscientious CEOs & Open Technologists - April 25, 2013
Big Data Stocks? Invest in Data, not in Tools. - April 4, 2013
The Moral Foundations of Environmentalists - March 26, 2013
Your Values Predict the Stories You Choose - December 14, 2012
How to Prevent Mental Illness: Help others with their stressful life events - November 24, 2012
When is investment banking immoral? A review of Greg Smith’s book, Why I left Goldman Sachs. - November 21, 2012
On Mitt Romney and The X-Files - November 18, 2012
The Gaza Conflict and Being Pro-Peace rather than Anti-War - November 8, 2012
Bill O’Reilly, Sarah Palin and Paul Krugman need to get out of Maslow’s Basement. - November 5, 2012
Early Voting is a Social Influence Tool, so tell everyone when you vote!
Civil Politics Posts
- The Driven Snowe: Centrist as Outsider May 17, 2013 Beau Lebette
- Millennials: Not Immune to Extreme Partisanship May 8, 2013 Beau Lebette
- A Civil Exploration of Religion May 7, 2013 Connor Wood
- Does President Obama Golf Enough? April 30, 2013 Beau Lebette
- Ever Redder More Truly Blue: The Fate of States April 25, 2013 Beau Lebette
Popular Search Terms
- libertarian psychology
- Brother sister incest stories
- Brother and sister incest story
- real brother sister incest stories
- real brother sister incest story
- examples of limitations in psychology experiments
- http://www polipsych com/2010/12/29/tony-washington-brother-sister-incest/
- hypermoralism
- the differences between gross national happiness and gross domestic product
- brother sister incest true stories
February 20th, 2011 - 14:28
Wouldn’t this suggest that all political and religious stripes (liberals, conservatives, libertarians, Christians, Muslims, atheists, etc) are susceptible to hypermoralism, whereas agnostics, moderates and independents would be less so?
February 21st, 2011 - 12:44
yes, that would be a true interpretation. One can come up with historical examples of extremists of all persuasions causing terrible harm due to moral concerns, whereas I can’t think of any moderates or agnostics who cause such issues.
April 9th, 2012 - 22:06
It seems highly probable that hypermoralism correlates with psychological predispositions/traits such as authoritarianism and need for closure. If that is the case, some research might imply a different conclusion about hypermoralism.
There was an assumption by many that authoritarianism would be found equally on the left and the right, but all the research done on this hasn’t supported this. In liberal democracies such as the US, liberals and left-wingers are less authoritarian than conservatives and right-wingers. There isn’t even a strong tendency of authoritarianism that can be found when comparing the left with moderates and centrists.
Other research has found different results in communist countries, but even here a point must be clarified. In a country that has been strongly communist for generations, defenders of communism inevitably are defenders of the status quo and so they measure high on traits related to social conservatism. This is where it is necessary to differentiate ideologies from traits. Even in Western history, it is obvious that social conservatives haven’t always defended capitalism and have often been its greatest critics.
Unrelated to authoritarianism, I would add that some data I’ve seen shows that independents are some of the most extremist. This makes sense when you realize that most independents probably see themselves as outside of the party system, rather than in between the parties. Moderates, on the other hand, are different than independents in that they tend to favor one party which they also tend to vote for and so they aren’t really in the hypothetical center. The mystical beast called a centrist is very rare in reality.