<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J Street vs. The Weekly Standard: Is it possible to be pro-peace and pro-Israel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polipsych.com/2009/10/16/j-street-vs-the-weekly-standard-is-it-possible-to-be-pro-peace-and-pro-israel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polipsych.com/2009/10/16/j-street-vs-the-weekly-standard-is-it-possible-to-be-pro-peace-and-pro-israel/</link>
	<description>Exploring Political Attitudes Through Moral Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.polipsych.com/2009/10/16/j-street-vs-the-weekly-standard-is-it-possible-to-be-pro-peace-and-pro-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polipsych.com/2009/10/16/j-street-vs-the-weekly-standard-is-it-possible-to-be-pro-peace-and-pro-israel/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Oh, and one thing shpouldn&#039;t be forgotten: J-Street&#039;s target group isn&#039;t the public in Israel, it&#039;s US lawmakers and US donors. And jewish US citizen overhwlemingly voted for  Obama. So, appeasing to the weakly standard mob would be counter-productive because it wouldn&#039;t go down well with J-Streets supporters. Nothing to be gained from false tolerance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and one thing shpouldn&#8217;t be forgotten: J-Street&#8217;s target group isn&#8217;t the public in Israel, it&#8217;s US lawmakers and US donors. And jewish US citizen overhwlemingly voted for  Obama. So, appeasing to the weakly standard mob would be counter-productive because it wouldn&#8217;t go down well with J-Streets supporters. Nothing to be gained from false tolerance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.polipsych.com/2009/10/16/j-street-vs-the-weekly-standard-is-it-possible-to-be-pro-peace-and-pro-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polipsych.com/2009/10/16/j-street-vs-the-weekly-standard-is-it-possible-to-be-pro-peace-and-pro-israel/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>An interesting study, with a somewhat suprising result. Only thing to criticize is the laisez faire attitude towards the weakly standard. This publication is really a pure smear, which spreads distortions and outright lies for partisan purposes. False tolerance of this outfit would be appeasement! J-Street is right in calling out this propaganda site for what it is: “thuggish smear tactics” by &quot;unhinged&quot; right wingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting study, with a somewhat suprising result. Only thing to criticize is the laisez faire attitude towards the weakly standard. This publication is really a pure smear, which spreads distortions and outright lies for partisan purposes. False tolerance of this outfit would be appeasement! J-Street is right in calling out this propaganda site for what it is: “thuggish smear tactics” by &#8220;unhinged&#8221; right wingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
